Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 9:58:24 GMT 1
However, the plaintiff did not clearly state the setting, type and quantity of the ornaments in the petition, and no clear determination could be made regarding the requested ornaments in the report on which the judgment was based. In this case, in accordance with Article 31 of the Civil Code, within the scope of the judge's obligation to enlighten the case, the court asked the plaintiff to explain his request for the jewelery he is the subject of the case, and accordingly, the duly selected expert expert asked him to explain the type, quality, amount (carat and gram) and value of the household goods and jewellery. While a report should be obtained clearly and the result to be obtained should be st the dowry claim on the grounds that a dowry certificate was issued from witness statements and it was determined as 101 gold coins, and upon the appeal of the defendant-counter-plaintiff man, the Istanbul Regional Court of Justice 38 .
However, the plaintiff did not clearly state the France Telegram Number Data setting, type and quantity of the ornaments in the petition, and no clear determination could be made regarding the requested ornaments in the report on which the judgment was based. In this case, in accordance with Article 31 of the Civil Code, within the scope of the judge's obligation to enlighten the case, the court asked the plaintiff to explain his request for the jewelery he is the subject of the case, and accordingly, the duly selected expert expert asked him to explain the type, quality, amount (carat and gram) and value of the household goods and jewellery. While a report should be obtained clearly and the result to be obtained should be stated in a way that would not cause any difficulty in the execution of the debt imposed on the parties and the right granted to them, it was not deemed appropriate to make a decision in writing, and this necessitated reversal.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 10.06.2020, 2020/958 E., 2020/2825 K. The plaintiff-counter-defendant woman requested the refund of the price of 101 republic gold coins if they were not the same due to the dowry bill issued during her marriage along with the divorce case, and the defendant-counter-plaintiff man claimed that no dowry bill was issued between the parties when they got married, and Küçükçekmece 6th family court 2016/ With its decision numbered 224, 2017/408, dated 07/06/2017, it was decided to accept the dowry claim on the grounds that a dowry certificate was issued from witness statements and it was determined as 101 gold coins, and upon the appeal of the defendant-counter-plaintiff man, the Istanbul Regional Court of Justice 38 .
However, the plaintiff did not clearly state the France Telegram Number Data setting, type and quantity of the ornaments in the petition, and no clear determination could be made regarding the requested ornaments in the report on which the judgment was based. In this case, in accordance with Article 31 of the Civil Code, within the scope of the judge's obligation to enlighten the case, the court asked the plaintiff to explain his request for the jewelery he is the subject of the case, and accordingly, the duly selected expert expert asked him to explain the type, quality, amount (carat and gram) and value of the household goods and jewellery. While a report should be obtained clearly and the result to be obtained should be stated in a way that would not cause any difficulty in the execution of the debt imposed on the parties and the right granted to them, it was not deemed appropriate to make a decision in writing, and this necessitated reversal.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 10.06.2020, 2020/958 E., 2020/2825 K. The plaintiff-counter-defendant woman requested the refund of the price of 101 republic gold coins if they were not the same due to the dowry bill issued during her marriage along with the divorce case, and the defendant-counter-plaintiff man claimed that no dowry bill was issued between the parties when they got married, and Küçükçekmece 6th family court 2016/ With its decision numbered 224, 2017/408, dated 07/06/2017, it was decided to accept the dowry claim on the grounds that a dowry certificate was issued from witness statements and it was determined as 101 gold coins, and upon the appeal of the defendant-counter-plaintiff man, the Istanbul Regional Court of Justice 38 .